513.381.VISA (8472)
Musillo Unkenholt LLC | 302 West Third, Suite 710 | Cincinnati, Ohio

Archive for Uncategorized

USCIS WILL ALLOW MORE I-485 FILINGS IN OCTOBER THAN USUAL

USCIS has announcedthat for October 2016 it will allow I-485 filings for those immigrant visaapplicants who qualify under the more favorable Date of Filing chart
Dates of Filing Chart – October 2016

Employment-
based
All Chargeability 
Areas Except
Those Listed
CHINA-
mainland 
born
INDIA
PHILIPPINES 
1st
C
C
C
C
2nd
C
01MAR13
22APR09 
C
3rd
C
01MAY14
01JUL05
01SEP13
If you have apriority date earlier than the dates listed on the above table, and you arelawfully in the United States, you can file your I-485 from October 1-31,2016.  Please keep in mind that the USCISwill not approve your immigrant visa application unless your priority date isearlier than the standard Final Action chart.
Final Action Chart– October 2016

Employment
based
All Charge-
ability 
Areas Except
Those Listed
CHINA-
mainland 
born
INDIA
PHILIPPINES
1st
C
C
C
C
2nd
C
15FEB12
15JAN07
C
3rd
01JUN16 
22JAN13
01MAR05
01DEC10

FAQ ON THE NEW FCCPT STANDARD

What is the new policy?
All applicants forthe FCCPT Type I Certificate must now hold a diploma that says the word “Masters”.  If you have a diploma that says “Bachelors”you will not be eligible for the Type I Certificate.  Also, an applicantmust have at least 202.1 credit hours.
When does the new policy go into effect?
It is effective immediately.  If you have a pending Application before theFCCPT, they will be returning your Application and issuing you a refund.
I have heard that the standard may be againraise to a Doctorate of Physical Therapy. True?
Yes.  It is expected that if you apply for the TypeI after January 1, that you will need to have a DPT in order to qualify for theType I.
But when I graduated from University, theAmerican standard was a lesser degree. Am I “grandfathered in” under the old standard?
Unfortunately theUSCIS is taking the position that the Application filing date is controlling,not the date of graduation.
I have a Type I that is expiringshortly.  Should I be concerned?
No. Renewals do NOT examine education, only licensure verification and proofof English proficiency.
Why is the USCIS doing this?
The USCIS’decision was predicated on a number of misunderstandings and inaccuracies.USCIS’ decision to terminate FCCPT accrediting these international programs islargely based on flawed assumptions around required coursework hours and degreetitles. 
Is anyone doing anything to try and changethis new policy?
Yes.  There is a concerted effort from stakeholdersto educate the USCIS about the problems with its new interpretation and themassive impact on US patients and on internationally-trained Physical Therapists.

USCIS DEMANDS THAT FCCPT RAISES STANDARD FOR THE TYPE I

In an unprecedenteddevelopment, USCIS is demanding that FCCPT only issue FCCPT Type I Certificatesto graduates of university programs whose diplomatitles read “Masters Degree,” and who have at least 202.1 credit hours.  Any graduate of a program that is equivalentto a US Masters Degree will no longer be eligible to enter the US and practice PhyscialTherapy.  USCIS’ actions put US patients’lives at risk, decimate an already dire Physcial Therapy shortage, and alienatefully qualified foreign-trained Physcial Therapists.
USCIS has issued aNotice of Intent to Deny the FCCPT’s ability to issue Type I Certificates.  FCCPT is understandably ceding to the USCIS’wishes in spite of USCIS outrageous action. The USCIS’ actions were done without the advice and consultation ofinterested stakeholders, such as FSBPT, APTA, CAPTE and the AAIHR.  It is unclear if the USCIS has consulted withthe US HHS, which it is required to do by statute.
The AAIHR hasissued a press release on this matter,which sums up the issue:
“USCIS’ decision was predicated on a numberof potential misunderstandings and inaccuracies. USCIS’ decision toterminate FCCPT accrediting these international programs is largely based onassumptions around required coursework hours and degree titles.  However, the comparison of degree “titles” orcredit hours is irrelevant. Titles and credit hours vary by institution.”

MU Law is releasing an FAQ shortly. 

VISA BULLETIN PREDICTIONS FOR 2016-17

The Department ofState’s Visa Bulletin guru, Charlie Oppenheim, hosts monthlymeetings with the American Immigration lawyers Association.  Charlie Oppenheim is the Department of State’s Chief of the Control and Reporting Division. He is the officerwho is responsible for producing the Visa Bulletin each month.  This month’s Check In With Charliefeatured predictions about EB2 and EB3 in most of the popular categories for readersof this Blog.  Here are some highlights:
Philippine EB3 – Charlie offered someof his most optimistic predictions for this category.  He expects that this category will initially moveabout three weeks per Bulletin, but that it should speed through 2011 and 2012,likely finishing the fiscal year into 2013. This is consistent with internal MU Law analysis which sees thiscategory progressing into 2013 by the Summer of 2017.  
India EB2 and EB3 – The DOS expectsthat EB2 will move at a three to four month rate.  Those in this category are cautioned that2007 was a very unusual year in immigration because of the VisaGate scandal in 2007.  Therefore wemay see inconsistent progressions until the date moves comfortably beyondmid-2007. 
The EB3 categorywill move much slower.  Charlie says justone week per Bulletin.

Worldwide EB-2 and EB-3 – EB-2 willremain current for the foreseeable future. Charlie cautions that demand is increasing in this category.  It may be necessary to implement a cut-offdate sometime in the Spring of 2017. Worldwide EB-3 will continue to see a slight retrogression.

OCTOBER 2016 VISA BULLETIN

The Department of State has just issued the October 2016 Visa Bulletin.  This is the first Visa Bulletin of Fiscal Year 2017. As the fiscal year begins we are able to make some educated guesses at where the Visa Bulletin will be in the future.

October 2016 Visa Bulletin


Final Action Dates

Applications with these dates may be approved for their Green Card (Permanent Residency card).

Employ-
ment
based
All Charge-
ability 
Areas Except
Those Listed
CHINA-
mainland 
born
INDIA
MEXICO
PHILIPPINES
1st
C
C
C
C
C
2nd
C
12FEB12
15JAN07
C
C
3rd
01JUN16
22JAN13
15MAR05
01JUN16
01DEC10

MU Law Analysis


All Other:  The EB-2 has been current for many years.  The EB-3 progression continues.  For Consular processing cases a June 2016 date is effectively Current.

China:   As expected, these dates moved forward 2+ years.  Unusually, the China EB-3 has a more favorable date than EB-2, although this phenomenon has happened often for China as a result of many Chinese EB-3 workers “upgrading” their applications to EB-2.

India:  EB-2 India had a notable progression from last month.  It will be interesting to see how this date moves forward.  In the Summer of 2007 hundreds of thousands of I-485 Applications were filed a result of VisaGate.  As a result of that bulk of filings, this number could slow in the forthcoming months.
EB-3 had its usual one month forward movement.  

Mexico: Mirrors All Other in all aspects.

Philippines: EB-3 moved ahead by another six months.  The Phillippine EB-3 number essentially cleaned out all 2010 EB-3 visas in just two months.  This is what we have expected.  (Our note from May 2016: “MU Law believes that Philippines EB-3 will continue to steadily move forward in the coming months. We expect it to move into 2009 in the by early summer, and may reach 2010 by the end of this fiscal year.”).  

We expect more of the same fast progression in FY2017 for Philippine EB-3.  We expect that the Philippine EB-3 number will progress at least three years in FY2017.

USCIS PROPOSES NEW RULE FOR ENTREPRENEURS

On Friday, August 26, 2016 the USCIS released a proposed rulewhich would allow certain entrepreneurs to enter the United States for atemporary period of time to start a business in the US. 
The proposed rule would allow entrepreneurs of startupentities to enter the US, if the startup will provide a significant publicbenefit through the substantial and demonstrated potential for rapid businessgrowth and job creation.  Under theproposed rule, the USCIS will decide on a case-by-case basis if theentrepreneur is eligible to enter the US. Factors to be considered are:
·        If the entrepreneur has a significant interest in the startup(at least 15%) and has an active role in the startup’s operations;
·        If the startup was formed in the US within the past threeyears;
·        If the startup has substantial and demonstrated potential forrapid business growth and job creation, as evidenced by:
o   significantinvestment of capital (at least $345,000) from US investors with record ofsuccess,
o   significantinvestment of capital (at least $100,000) from a US government entity(ies),
o   partiallysatisfying one or both of the above criteria in addition to other reliable andcompelling evidence of the startup’s potential for growth and job creation.
Under this new rule, theentrepreneur may be granted up to a two year stay in the US to overseestartup.  The entrepreneur may be grantedan additional three year stay, but only if the entrepreneur and the startupentity continue to meet the criteria above.

Foradditional information, please see the USCISwebsite

IMMIGRANTS ARE “IMPERATIVE” TO CURE US HEALTHCARE STAFFING SHORTAGES

A new report by theInstitutefor Immigration Research declares that immigrant labor plays an “outsizedand imperative role in the US healthcare system.  The AdvanceHealthcare Network reports that the IIR reports these figures of the populationare immigrant labor:
  • 28% of physiciansand surgeons
  • 40% of medicalscientists in pharmaceutical research and development
  • 50% of medicalscientists in biotechnology in states with a strong biotechnology sector
  • 22% of nursing,psychiatric and home health aides
  • 15% of registerednurses 

This is in spite ofthe fact that only 13% of the US population is foreign-born.  The IIR is funded by George MasonUniversity. 
The AHN write-upquotes Monica GomezIsaac, executive director of George Mason’s IIR.  Ms. Isaac is very positive about thecontributions that immigrants make in these fields, but she is incorrect inthis quote:  
“In the instance of nurses, thelack of an international standard for qualifying registered nurses is absent.The varying degrees of training based on the standards of individual nationsmake it complex to recruit and fill nursing shortages.”
This is untrue fortwo reasons.  First, there is aninternational standard for qualifying nurses. All US nurses must pass the NCLEX-RN Exam, which is offeredall around the world.  Second, thetraining standards are not the reason for the lack of foreign-born nurses.  Between15-20,000 internationally-trained RNs are registering to take the NCLEX-RN examevery year.  In the mid-2000s, thatnumber was even higher. 
The problem is theimmigrant visa retrogression.  A fully-qualifiednurse from the Philippines takes 3-5 to get her immigrant visa.  A fully-qualified Indian nurse takes 10+years.  If the US Congress would updatethe immigration laws to allow in more nurses, the bottleneck would fade.

FORTY-SEVEN IMMIGRANT ATHLETES COMPETE FOR TEAM US IN RIO

Asthe Olympics in Rio come to a close, athletes for Team USA – both native andforeign born – have represented the red, white, and blue.  The US sent 555 athletesto the Olympic Games in 27 sports.  Forty-sevenof Team USA’s competitors were born outside the United States!

Notableimmigrant athletes on Team USA included:
  • Danell Leyva (gymnastics) was born in Cuba anddefected to Miami, Florida with his mom and sister whenhe was only two years old.  Danellwon two silver medals at the Rio Olympics on the men’s parallel bars and themen’s horizontal bar.
  • Meb Keflezighi (track and field) is one of the mostdecorated US marathoners of all time. Born in Eritrea, he moved to the US at the age of 11.  In 2014 he won the Boston Marathon becomingthe first American to do so since 1983. Meb will run in the men’s marathon onSunday, August 21, becoming theoldest US Olympic runner of all time
  • NickDelpopolo (judo) was born in Serbia and Montenegro; he spent the firstfew years of his life in an orphanage until hewas adopted by a couple from New Jersey
  • Paul Kipkemoi Chelimo (track and field) was born inKenya, but became a US citizen afterenlisting in the US Army and beinga part of the World Class Athlete Program.   Paul, along with two other foreign-born USathletes, Bernard Lagat and Hassan Mead, willrun in the men’s 500m final on Saturday, August 20
  • Kyrie Irving (basketball) was born in Melbourne,Australia while his father pursued a professional career in an Aussieleague.  He holds dual citizenship andwas asked to play on the Australian national team, but choseto play for Team USA.
Congratulationsto all the athletes on Team USA and too all the Olympians!

MU LAW CINCINNATI SEMINAR: IMMIGRATION SOLUTIONS FOR A TIGHT LABOR MARKET

Musillo UnkenholtLLC (MU Law) is proud to co-sponsor a Cincinnati seminar with Graydon Head, Cincinnati’s premier full-servicelaw firm.  The event will be held September13, 2016 on the campus of Xavier University. The program runs from 7:30 – 10:00 AM and will feature a panel of localCincinnati business leaders.  The seminaris free to attend.
JoinGraydon Head & Musillo Unkenholt as they lead an informativeconversation about using immigration to solve staffing supply shortages – andthe legal and practical issues that may arise. A panel of experts who have dealt with thesesituations will share their struggles and successes on using immigration solutionsin a tight labor market.
If you are interested in attending,please RSVP to Sam Rossell, 513.629.2727 or viaemail
This program isvalid for 1.5 PDCs for the SHRM-CP or SHRM-SCP. For more information aboutcertification or recertification, please visit www.shrmcertification.org.

SEPTEMBER 2016 VISA BULLETIN

The Department of State has just issued the September 2016 Visa Bulletin.  This is the twelfth and final Visa Bulletin of Fiscal Year 2016. As the fiscal year winds down, the last few Visa Bulletins always have some surprises.  

This Visa Bulletin is no exception.  Some dates progressed favorably.  Other dates retrogressed.  Rest assured that these changes are temporary. 

Readers should rest assured that everything will go back to “normal” on October 1, 2016, the start of the next fiscal year.

September 2016 Visa Bulletin

Final Action Dates

Applications with these dates may be approved for their Green Card (Permanent Residency card).

Employ-
ment
based
All Charge-
ability 
Areas Except
Those Listed
CHINA-
mainland 
born
INDIA
MEXICO
PHILIPPINES
1st
C
01JAN10
01JAN10
C
C
2nd
01FEB14
01JAN10
22FEB05 
01FEB14
01FEB14
3rd
01MAY16 
01JAN10
15FEB05
01MAY16 
01JUL10

MU Law Analysis


All Other:  The EB-2 has been current for many years.  The retrogression of the EB-2 category simply means that the DOS approved more cases than it expected to in FY2016.  The EB-3 moved forward by two months.  These dates continue to be very favorable.  We expect that All Other dates will continue to be positive for the foreseeable future, starting on October 1, 2016.

China:   These dates mirror the August 2016’s Visa Bulletin.  We expect positive movement in October 2016.

India:  EB-3 moved ahead by ten weeks as did EB-2.  The DOS is trying to make sure that all available Indian immigrant visas are used.  

Mexico: Mirrors All Other in all aspects.

Philippines: EB-3 moved ahead by ten months, into 2010.  This is what we have expected.  (Our note from May 2016: “MU Law believes that Philippines EB-3 will continue to steadily move forward in the coming months. We expect it to move into 2009 in the by early summer, and may reach 2010 by the end of this fiscal year.”).  The Feb 2014 retrogression date for EB-2 should be of no concern for those in this category.  Philippine EB-2 will be current in October 2016.

<1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 ... 107 >