Archive for Uncategorized

The USCIS announced that the Fiscal Year 2012 H-1B cap was reached on November 22, 2011. USCIS will reject cap-subject petitions for new H-1B specialty occupation workers seeking an employment start date in FY 2012 that arrive after November 22, 2011.

International workers who are working in the U.S. on an H-1B visa with another cap-subject employer are not subject to H-1B cap. These cases are commonly referred to as “H-1B transfer” cases and may be filed at any time throughout the year.

Employees that need a “cap-subject” H-1B must wait to file their Petition until April 1, 2012, for an employment start date of October 1, 2012. “Cap-subject” H-1B petitions include:

* International students working on an EAD card under an OPT or CPT program after having attended a U.S. school

* International employees working on a TN may need an H-1B filed for them in order for them to pursue a permanent residency (green card) case

* Prospective international employees in another visa status e.g. H-4, L-2, J-1, F-1

* H-1B workers with a cap exempt organization

* Prospective international employees currently living abroad

For many non-Indian and non-Chinese natives, the EB-2 Permanent Residency visa (green card) provides a fast and cost-effective alternative to the H-1B process. The EB-2 also allows for a much faster green card process when compared to the EB-3 Permanent Residency process.

The EB-2 is available when the employer requires a Masters Degree for entry into the position and the Physical Therapist holds a Masters Degree. USCIS regulation says that a Masters Degree is equivalent to a Bachelors Degree and five years of progressive experience.

MU Law has successfully applied for the EB-2 for many Physical Therapists who have five years of progressive experience in occupation after the attainment of their Bachelors degree.

The USCIS has been inconsistent in their adjudication of Physical Therapist EB-2 Petitions when the Therapist holds an FCCPT “first professional degree” evaluation. The inconsistency largely is due to some degree being titled, Bachelor Degree, when in fact, these degrees are equivalent ot a US Masters Degree.

Legally speaking, the USCIS ought to be approving these Petitions since the independent FCCPT evaluations equate the Physical Therapists foreign degrees to a US Masters Degree. FCCPT is a premier credentialing evaluator for Physical Therapists. In May 2010, its FCCPT Type I Certification was re-certified by the USCIS until 2015. CGFNS offers a similar certification called the Visa Screen. CGFNS is also a premier credentialing evaluator for Physical Therapists.

MU Law successfully has filed many EB-2 Petitions for many Employers and Therapists. These Petitions are not simple filings, but require a substantive legal analysis of the employer’s hiring practices and the Therapists’ educational background. If you are interested in having an MU attorney review your matter for applicability as an EB-2 Permanent Residency green card, please contact Chris Musillo or Cindy Unkenholt.

MU clients are urged to initiate and file any regular cap-subject H-1B cases as soon as possible. The H-1B cap likely will be reached in December 2011.

The latest USCIS update is that 49,200 of the 65,000 regular H-1B numbers have been used as of October 28, 2011, leaving 15,800 H-1B visas. Based on prior year’s usage, MU expects that the demand will rise again in November. The demand for H-1B numbers historically has spiked as the H-1B number grows closer to 65,000.

Employees that may need an H-1B visa include:

• International students working on an EAD card under an OPT or CPT program after having attended a U.S. school
• International employees working on a TN may need an H-1B filed for them in order for them to pursue a permanent residency (green card) case
• Prospective international employees in another visa status e.g. H-4, L-2, J-1, F-1;- H-1B workers with a cap exempt organization
• Prospective international employees currently living abroad

International workers who are working in the U.S. on an H-1B visa with another cap-subject employer are not subject to H-1B cap. These cases are commonly referred to as “H-1B transfer” cases and may be filed at any time throughout the year.

Additionally, the USCIS sets aside an additional 20,000 H-1B numbers for graduates of US Masters degree (or higher) programs through a program referred to as the “H-1B Masters Cap”. The H-1B Masters Cap has been reached. H-1B Masters Cap petitions are now also counted against the regular H-1B cap.

In a quick break from this policy, USCIS Director Mayorkas announced that the USCIS will revert back to the long-standing policy of sending I-797 Approval Notices to the Petitioners and Beneficiaries’ representatives and lawyers. MU Law applauds this reversion of policy. The USCIS is often lambasted for ill-thought out policy. It is therefore only right to highlight when they make the right decision.

Staffing companies provide value in industries where there is a shortage of qualified labor because the ability for flexible labor is great. Similarly, high rates of immigration are common in occupations where there are shortages of labor.

It is therefore understandable that many companies that employ large numbers of immigrants are staffing companies. The H-1B visa is the most common visa vehicle for these workers. Healthcare staffing companies often employ Physical Therapists and Occupational Therapists via the H-1B visa.

These companies often then have to move these workers to new geographical locations as dictated by client’s needs. While a new or amended H-1B visa is required when there is a material change in an employee’s job duties, a new or amended H-1B visa traditionally is unnecessary when an H-1B worker moves to a new geographical location.

As Musillo Unkenholt explained in an April 2010 letter to a public inquiry request by the USCIS,

In at least five prior correspondences (all referenced in the MU letter), USCIS and Legacy INS officials have determined that a simple geographic change is an immaterial change, and therefore the H-1B amendment rule is not triggered.

Practically and legally there is good reason for the existing USICS policy; a simple geographical change does not change the H-1B worker’s underlying job duties.

In AILA’s notes from an October 5 meeting with the USCIS, the USCIS implied that it may soon require a new or amended H-1B to be filed when there is a change in the worker’s geographical location. The USCIS full comments were:

USCIS RESPONSE: This issue is currently under examination within the H-1B policy review working group as part of the comprehensive USCIS policy review. We will take AILA’s views into consideration when finalizing the policy on what circumstances would require an amended petition to be filed with USCIS.

There is no rationale for a change in policy on this issue other than to create additional administrative burdens on H-1B Petitioners. Musillo Unkenholt hopes that the USCIS instead focuses its efforts on those who abuse the immigration system.

The Fiscal Year 2012 (FY2012) H-1B cap season began on April 1, 2011. Since April 1, a mere 41,000 H-1B cap-subject Petitions have been receipted by USCIS as of October 7, 2011. This is much lower than in recent years and likely reflects the fact that US employers are not hiring workers, including foreign-national workers.

Many healthcare professions ordinarily qualify for H-1B status, including Physical Therapists, Occupational Therapists, Speech Language Therapists, and some Registered Nursing positions.

The US Department of Justice filed suit against Generations Healthcare, a Skilled Nursing Facility, on Friday September 30, 2011. The lawsuit alleges that Generations Healthcare engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination by imposing unnecessary documentary requirements on job applicants.

The DOJ’s press release says that its investigation uncovered evidence that Generations Healthcare required all newly hired non-U.S. citizens and naturalized U.S. citizens at its St. Francis Pavilion facility to present specific and extra work authorization documents beyond those required by federal law to prove their status. These documents were not required of native-born US citizens.

MU Law clients and friends are reminded that US employers have to comply with the Form I-9 when hiring new employees. The Form I-9 identifies a variety of documents that may be used by job applications to prove valid work authorization and identity; it does not mandate that any specific document must be used.